. . . learning General truths and the Universal eternity . . . .



- it seems that for those with sufficiently eternal experience the following theory is partially real,,...


This is a learning attempt route at reading the one-track
mindfulness into the vast unlimited infinitely limited

If you see some self-limited thinking it's
probably because I was self-limited &<#



Existence, experience, material, all, infinity, Lord, God, causality - diversity of influence, creation, individuality - point of view and ordering, evolution - progress and regress, success and failure, will and effect, eternal time, history and space, time-travel, variety, pattern and potency.


1 General Truths 2 The Eternal Universe

Big introductory results: Envisaging, describing and summarising eternity

Think: infinitely many unique categories of irreduceable elemental experiences...
Suppose: All conceivable is not all possible...
To prove: Requires to know that the infinite the all IS all AND no more.
...And so to know this means all '>' infinite.

Our knowledge and language use forever wax and wane in all beings, to make room for mystery and surprise - but our love eventually increases to the maximum - never to decrease again. Various experiences max and min in all - ever and anon - after the love max has been eternal established.

Knowing Truth: God puts eternity into human hearts... Eternity may be scoured in search of confirmation or contradiction of logical statements... This provides a mechanism that God uses to make us certain of the truth or falsity of any relevant statements we can analyse... Our being can scan the eternal universe, by God's enablement, for any evidence to the contrary of any comprehendable statement and if we fail to come up with negative results we can be sure, having scoured all experience in existence, and having found evidence that the statement is in someway true - we are sure that we have perceived it to be evidently true as knowledge of perceptions of the sensitivity to surreality rather than merely a real imagined perception of ambiguous arbitary fictional, temporary or space-limited. Many things - various extremes of evil and suffering - are entirely imaginary - they cannot exist in the realm of perceivable observation. The extreme limit of evil is always impossible to know, perceive, observe or even to imagine - it has been considered and found wanting and evaluated to be undesirable and banned from further appreciation or investigation. Some merely imaginary experiences never become perceived observations yet every good imagination becomes for the imaginer an endlessly re-visited imagination, observation and perception also.

Hierarchy of Thought: The apprehensions of the mind can be considered in the following order of generality; appreciation, interest, consideration, evaluation, negotiation, knowledge, perception, observation and imagination. Knowledge involves experience of the identities of other beings. Perceptions involve experience of positions in time. Observation senses positions in space. Purely imaginary experiences lack identity, time, spatial awareness. Shared knowledge involves knowing identities are experienced as part of some other being's experience also. Shared perception involves knowing that other beings experience what you experience concurrently. Imaginations are experiences in which the identities and positions are ambiguous. In dreaming - knowledge of identities and perceptions of positions in time and observation of actual (shared with another's experience of the same substantial content of experience) spatial position may enter into imaginary experience. Temporary imaginations are experiences that eventually become merely hypothetical as regards the future rather than repeatedly realisable in the endless future.

The Generality Code: Jesus is God's Logical Account - the Word or Message of God - the Truth about all things, and the whole Image or Symbolic Representation of God - even as mankind is a partial image of God... The Whole Truth of eternal existence is axiomatic - entirely decribable by means of logical statements that follow logically from the entirely discernable axioms of existence so that the Truth does not contradict itself anywhere and no paradox is intractable - all can be explained and described logically and coherently - so nothing is beyond the reach of codification or language - even language code using finite or infinitesimal elements... So God can and will communicate to Himself and every creature, as and when He desires to enlighten them concerning all His comprehended experience using any language or code system that He may choose...

All logically consistent codes and true definitions are beyond contradiction... An attempt to communicate what is irrelevant directly or by code may be ignored, or remain unknown - to some measure, until it can be accepted as relevant either in its original form or made relevant by transformation. Codes are eternal yet codes, language and definitions apply to particular experiences only as we are currently able to translate each linguistic description.

It is possible to have impossibilities - impossibilities are possibilities in the imagination - hypotheticals that are not able to happen at an observable locality, perceivable time or to a known identity - or they break a code/language definition. So some statements may point our minds towards impossibilities but some of these get turned into possibilities by the passing of time. Some things can be imagined to some degree but are not permitted to occur for observation, perception, knowledge, negotiation, evaluation, consideration, interest or appreciation. Absolute impossibilities are not even permitted to be experienced in any way - even in the imagination. Attempts to experience them will always result in thought-block.

. . . 1  General Truths . . . .

God is currently able to see everything even at the minimum intensity of emitted light so nothing is hidden by darkness for Him. And He can see all, at all intensities of emitted light, so to God there are no shadows due to what we experience as absorption because - in the summation view of God - no light is absorbed so as to be beyond the reach of sight. Yet God does perceive our blindnesses and experience of the emptiness dark experience too. As we lose our sins, we often lose our blindnesses with them.

It is possible to assign unique essential experiences to identify specifically each person in the universe. Numbers are essentially repetitions of addition of same to same. Yet experiences such as colours are essentially distinguished by their difference from all the other colours - this difference transcends the repetition of numbers. Therefore colours are a more transcendent way of uniquely naming or tagging a person to distinguish them from all the other people, than numbers are.

Within God's fairness - His justice overall through time - He allows a certain degree of injustice - things that He dislikes - and to illustrate and demonstrate this fairness He allowed, indeed willed by His permissive will, that His Son would be crucified - something He disliked as His Son had not held back from doing anything the Father desired, so according to God's sense of justice the crucifixion was unjust - yet others also have suffered injustice according to God's will. Also this form of injustice called self-sacrifice is considered lawful for the sacrificed person but unlawful for those afflicting them - an interesting assymetry.

The all has the most variety of experience; relationship and influence... They can be imagined to cause things from more points of view than others. This includes the causing of things opposite to the desire of choice regarding those things. Concerning some occurrences we are doomed to make no choice at all and yet our existence may be deemed to cause the occurrence with or without our effort. Wilful causation is what we mean if we say someone did something - it is when, what someone willed through their efforts of desire and/or decision and/or implementing force actually happens. This is various from abstract causation in which everyone causes everything and can be said philosophically to have done everything even what is contrary to their wills. Time is defined by the present instant of attention and decision - the action of wilful causation - as a merely linear path far narrower than the complete interconnectivity of abstract causation. The experience that some being has of expending effort to force some influence onto the future needs to be philosophically entirely separate in the mind from the idea that this force indeed forces that influence on the future. There is force as subjective effort and force as objective effect - imputed to subjective efforts. The imputing is where we make an imaginary connection of effort to future event which we call the effort's effect. So there is effort force and event force or effect force - two entirely various concepts. So therefore infact a being's subjective effort may cause some other future event than the one desired, chosen, or forced by them. This can be shown by the example of trying various switches to see which one of them will open a door - some switches may turn lights on or even lock the door you are trying to open. In some instances, what is willed appears to produce no desired or chosen result - so it is not both the wilful cause and willed effect that are used to hold people accountable morally but only the desires and choices, force of effort that can be perceived as wilful causes that are taken into account - not the resulting effect. So it is according to the present instants of time in which desire and/or wilful decision take place that we are forgiven or judged - not the future outcome or effect. Our moral acts are our desires, choices and forces of our effort - not our resulting behaviours. So morally, it is essentially more a case of the subjective try or do not try, than the objective do or do not do since to do is not a moral issue unless God supplies you with the prophetic insights that if you try certain tasks you will succeed in achieving them - then your will has been tethered to some outcomes also. (Of course to try is to do in the subjective sense.) Humanity is responsible primarily for its desires concerning the future then its choices regarding the future and finally its effort to exert force that may be deemed to influence or effect the future. The effects of effort are incidental to the responsibilities of effort - we are asked to desire future events, and to choose between imaginary futures - which we exert effort to select, according to the imaginary futures that are held most perfect or ideal by God, and to exert effort to force those choices to become realised - yet in all this we are not held ultimately responsible for the outcome - God and time decide and are responsible for the effect of our effort. However, it is clear in the conscience that God demands sufficiently mentally endowed humanity to plan and strategise and force intelligently according to the recogisable laws of nature's easily intelligible cause and effect patterns so as to try to achieve identifiable results at least within certain degrees of approximaton.

God wills the enablement in His creatures to desire and/or choose towards God's ideal will or towards sin - missing the target of God's ideal. God also gives enablement to achieve what the creature wills. So that it is God's will that not everything that God ideally desires gets done since He gives strength, might and power to opposing wills (Mt 23:37). God's will bends wills towards or away from His ideal will - softening them towards it or hardening them away from it - So that it is God's will that through the agency of His creation God works out or opposes His own ideal will - the ideal will which He personally always conforms to regarding the attentions, decisions and efforts of His Own Substance in committing any act other than the creative act by which He creates opposition in His creatures. God 'bends' all the wills of His creation eventually towards sin and then each in their turn finds their wills 'bent back' into agreement with God's perfect will. God, then creates righteousness in Himself and a mixture of righteousness and sin in His creatures...

The Lord of the entire eternal universe creates, supplies and uses the Force by which the future is determined, and consists of three Beings Who are only ever personally using the stronger good side of the Force to force all other beings in the passing of time to reject the sinful side of the Force and comply with God's Own use of the Force for goodness and truth to find freedom and good reward. The Lord creates the sinful side of the force in His creatures and makes them to use it in various ways until He removes the sinfulness side of the force and the Force becomes good throughout. Truth and freedom are fundamental experiences of the entire eternal universe, and as such their meaning is not altered in various places, but God defines goodness, morality or justice in various ways for various beings and localities of the universe. Likewise, God uses various methods of reward and punishment for various beings in various regions as He brings His ideal order to things.

Faith in God is either any element of the attentions, apprehensions, sense processing, decisions, intentions, tryings and doings - of some truth of God's existence or the particular apprehension that He will cause something you choose, to happen in accordance with His own choice. The former faith is concerning what exists in the present - or our past experience. The latter form of faith is agreement of choice and outcome with the trustworthy God Who will enact what is entrusted with Him. The experience of truth in faith is what makes faith an evidenced tangible thing in the various apprehensions of the mind or a substantiation-confirmation, in the mind, of future things. Without faith in God at time of death you cannot currently be saved from the punishment of the lake of fire.

God is love. The love of God has happy appreciation of, apprehension of and perception of others and with expectant belief on God, for an experience for someone that accords with God's good will for that person which will be in agreement with their will and effort towards achieving generosity, truth and freedom.

Everything in our local universe has some form of love - love of God or of the world - or else it is nothing. People are conceived as salt of the earth and light of the world with love for the creation but can very quickly lose this natural love from God. Not all have love for God and, although God's transcendent love, faith and expectation are remaining, they do not remain in all beings all the time.

God commands that His love will be a distraction from sin for all... God is creating expectation in people that they will become good. God is installing hope in all by which they then earn good and worthwhile rewards. Additional to this God is installing love which earns 'greater' rewards according to the good experiences that exist in God's love.

One thing is needed: By loving God with all of your being - essence, spirit, soul, and body you may automatically love all of His creatures in the most loving way you can. Ideal love for God also ensures simultaneous love for the creation. Also he who loves his human brother indicates that he loves God also and is a child of God.

God's self-denying love compels us ever and anon to put priority preference to paying our eternal debt to meet God's and others good desires for themselves before our last minimum priority debt to meet our good desires for ourselves.

God respects fairly without partiality so He loves unequally in proportion to a being's worth and importance - bringing some more quickly than others into His full and good experience of eternity, yet He eventually shares all that He has with all. Jacob He loved and Esau He hated - although He loves all the creation - God makes some to sin more than others and makes some to forgive and be forgiven while locking others up in unforgiveness - whom He punishes for their unforgiven sins in hades and/or the lake of fire.

Time and history is determined by a game between truth and falsity... The part of your conscience that you use to decide what to choose may determine the outcome or may predict a false outcome depending on whether your conscience is good or bad on that issue... The hypothetical outcomes in your conscience that you don't choose along with the outcome that you do choose are there to help you to form, in the present moment, true or false understandings between you, and the other beings you have consciousness of, concerning how they will attempt to determine or actually determine the outcome - given the event that you choose any particular option... And the broadcast part of your conscience says what you will attempt/do in the event that they choose some option.

Effect may cause its own cause... Abstract cause and abstract effect are both true of any element of any experience in relation to any other. It is equally true to say that everyone causes you to be who you are as that you cause you to be who you are. All experience causes any experience, any experience causes all experience and any experience causes any experience - it cannot be disproved and it exists in the imagination. The Revelation to John teaches that God in Christ can be considered as the origin and the consummation - essentially this says that He is cause and effect in the most profound way. So God can be understood to cause effects in the most transcendent way. This means that His desiring, planning and willing and forcing actions cause everything in the most transcendent way. This is due to the infinite density of richness of God's ideal experience in the originating portions of time and the finalising portions of time when God becomes all in all - God and His Son are the greatest Initiators and Perfectors of every new development.

The all is the complete collection of beings who collectively have all orders of experience and contain maximum variety of experience. They can be imagined to relate to the ordering of all experiences in the most varied way although this involves the conflict of the desires they hold in regard to life's experiences. (The choices of the all include the setting of rules of consequence that limit the amount of choices and their outcomes - which God does - and God's permissive will makes His creatures responsible for choosing to bring various doubts and confusions as to what people are choosing and what will happen in the future (evil in the creature)).

Conscience is a tendency to choose to rely on, or put faith in, a present story-commentary about the impending consequences of choice and then conscience guides the actual desire to choose a subsequent course of action from those believed to be available. This tendency to use a map of hypothetical futures - as if they all speak with equal validity of the actual future you attempt to choose - in order to make your next choice involves belief in a set of rules of consequence. Even though all but one hypothetical choice remains hypothetical in the immediate future, these choices remain relevant in the future, as they are used to assess whether the correct or most desired choice was made, since considerations/feelings about these previous hypothetical options varies with time as part of the moral learning of the being with the desire to choose and conscience to guide this will. The learning is either about understanding of what is considered good or bad choice in terms of overall later reward (good) or punishment (bad), or, what are the changing desires of the being faced with the choices with regard to similar choices as and when they come around again - either the desires fix onto reward or punishment, either the conscience regarding outcomes of reward or punishment aligns with a general pattern - producing codes of conduct or the pattern seems random and patterns of behaviour resulting from the conscience are equally random... Conscience may be considered as something to seek Truth with - either reward or punishment - a way to find the outcome you consider correct or desirable, or else conscience is an entertainer to entertain you in the present with hypothetical ideas that are of little further use except as entertainment.

Without prophecy or knowledge of rules of choice-consequence the results of your choices are a complete surprise.

Every creature, after falling into bondage to sin and corruption eventually is freed from sin's dissatisfaction and comes to experience all that makes them happy.

Obedience for some, sometimes, is to happily experience the displeasure of unjust suffering... To suffer voluntarily for doing good is a trial of the endurance of love or faith and expectation that some will not pass... People's love and faith and expectation from God do not always endure continuously.

God tests us by sending us displeasure and we test Him when we sin...

God's rule is that according to the worth to us of the thing we give so we will receive in return - therefore Jesus said if you want to become comparable to God you'll need to disown your whole self from time to time.

God's kingdom is the rule of freedom... Freedom is the ability to be rewarded with power to determine your destiny. Freedom is transcendent ability to determine by the action of the will. Freedom of the will and determinism are two views on one concept of a difference of potency of the desires or wills of beings in the terms of their ability to achieve what they want - a difference of potency that makes an assymetry between wills and forms a hierarchy of wills according to the positive effectiveness of the choices the beings make in time to achieve what they want. God tunes all the efforts of the desires and choices in beings to seek what His ideal will seeks - thus all come to achieve what they want and share God's absolute freedom of desire and will. The great goal of all beings is to experience all of God's experience of everything - clearly none but God experience it in exactly the same ordering as God or they would be God.

A basis for our freedom is the strongest element of God's rule in our life He desires to free all... He frees all who want freedom and all do come to want freedom.

To give is better than to receive... Giving and receiving cannot always be simultaneous. Giving may sometimes be at the expense of receiving - selfish modes of receiving hinder some ways to give, however what is received allows more to be given eventually... It is better to allow a gift to pass you by in order to reach another than to grasp it as yours first, unless the gift is intended for you first. So the greatest thing love can do is deflect gifts towards others or share what is given, yet fully accepting of gifts for oneself is also part of justice... Jesus' example of great love involved total self-denial - to deny yourself means letting people be free to experience your private experience in any way that God desires. It means making your self entirely loyal to God's will to the extent that He fills you with His ability to love. As far as love's self-sacrifice for the good of others goes, God does not allow us to be tested by this to an extent that causes our hope in optimism to fully die...

Randomness is complexity of an operation still untraced. Chance indicates ignorance of prophetic knowledge. The contrasting of the words 'order' and 'chaos' as if they were mutually exclusive is a fallacy... often the words that would better convey the concepts experienced are the 'complexity' or the 'simplicity' of the rules known to be governing the situation.

God could only be entirely random chance to a creature that could not experience, believe, acknowledge, or discern any prophecy resulting from God's will, nor recognise from the memory that God's present will is able to cause the future to come to pass.

Regrets are a curious basis for re-inventing ourselves... Regrets needn't be unhappy and needn't involve the destructive feeling of wishing a thing had never happened... Whatever happens has to happen - it is all necessary for some purpose - to help us all to develop. You can't change what happened but true regret reconsiders the past to learn from God a better way of acting in a similar future set of events.

An easy way to develop wisdom and a critical mind is to read through collections of quotations and learn to disregard the somewhat simplistic attempts to make generalisations - a step further is to learn to imagine how they could be better phrased as more specifically oriented quotes... Or even, perhaps, perceive that they can associate in the mind to a true generalisation concerning some related subject matter.

The majority of the so-called fictional stories record in detail the facts of what has already happened to real people, often ages ago and in previous incarnations...

. . . 2  The Eternal Universe . . . .

Time travel comes with the restriction that all good experiences in history can only be erased temporarily, so that things may be experienced twice, even if from a various point of view in time in your personal history of experience. Also time travel may bring about erasure of unhappy and sinful experiences and these will all eventually be permanently forgotten or erased from all future experience of the past. Time travel into the future may set up restrictions on the way the intervening period of history can progress. Also, the ongoing exerience of the other intervening history may lead to you experiencing what you did through the leap into the future all over again, with the recognition that you can't do things variously the second time round but are bound over to experiencing the repetition of the history of your previous arrival in the future. Time travel into the past might lead to the experience of complete impotency to achieve certain goals because, if they were allowed, then the emerging history up until the time you travelled backwards through time, would have to be various - which is impossible - therefore you experience various impasses. Also what you do on re-entering the past may have been experienced by your original existence in that past so that you are now bound over to doing the things you already experienced to some measure in your past. Besides these restrictions there is the feature of existence where beings with identical pasts to you come to emerge into a various future to what you will have. But you may identically share some portions of their future at various times and so experience a multiplicity of alternative futures stemming from the one past you have - which later blend together into a multiplicity of futures which are experienced simultaneously in various bodies.

The all has limits on it - even God the Father, Who has the least number of limits, limits Himself along with everything else. He doesn't allow Himself to identify with evil and He limits the amount of evil that can be done to be less than the simultaneous amount of good. God is greater than the all in that His eternally good attentions, decisions and behaviours prevail and eventually completely dominate everywhere.

If you lack faith for an outcome then probability is your next best option which is based on faith in your complete knowledge of surroundings conditions and the laws governing the outcome. But through any infinitesimal chink of ignorance in a probability system might come any random infinite universe of experience.

Existence is experience and order (also an experience): Experience is ordained by God in His perception and imagination of the future and forced into existence... Beings are experiencers of orders of experience in particular time periods, both beings and experiences are existers. The experiences, they exist, but do not experience anything - they don't experience existing - they are not beings but things experienced by beings - the being experiences the experience but the experience only exists to the being not to itself - every experience is an element of a being's definition. Differences of experience distinguish beings from each other whether experiences of one's identity such as happiness, attentions, decisions, efforts or behaviours, or the experience of such experiences which belong to the identity of other beings.

All instantaneous infinitesimal individual appearances of substance in eternity (irreducable events) can be ordered one-by-one so that no two irreducable events are ever simultaneous and this ordering of life proceeds in precise turns as in a game of chess though some beings may get many turns as others are getting few turns - none have a turn at the same moment. What I have defined here is an eternity or eternal history which may be experienced for some finite period of time as a sub-eternity of a bigger game play of life - which may include simultaneous turns - in which beings experience the same elements of experience in the same order yet with a multitude of other simultaneous elements of experience alongside. Beings from time to time swap over who plays who in the personal eternal histories of experience within God's ideal originally experienced eternal history. So that all come eventually to play all possible games from all the various player points of view.

Great beings can have simultaneous experiences of various eternities in which they exist in a uniquely separated way in that sometimes their identity's experiences in any one eternity become limited to less than the total simultaneous experience that they might otherwise have of all the eternities that they currently exist in (have identities in). Only later or earlier than this time might that beings' total simultaneous experience of that time of relative unknowing be more fully experienced - as their own - identified with them and their other experiences... So then an eternity is an eternal history of experience made distinct from other eternities by relative periods of unknowing, on the part of beings, of their other identities in the other eternities in which they also exist. So, the fragmentation of a unique being's simultaneous experience defines separate eternities in which that being has parallel existence. An overall eternity is all smaller eternities experienced in eternal time together - arranged next to each other in all the possible ways - How they are relatively arranged overall helps distinguish the eternities from each other which have the same ordering of experience for any period of time. God originally experiences all ideal eternities together in parallel and limits, by His desire, which eternities are allowed to exist. Only once does God allow the temporary and short experience of history with sin and suffering to be experienced - after this only the ideal definition of eternity without sin and suffering is repeated in time with various beings re-experiencing it from various points of view... End zones of all time's repeated re-experiencing of all ideal eternities are mergings of all beings with their experiences into God's full parallel experience of all their original ideal eternities of experience - the total experience of the ideal eternity.

Each of us by overall definition discover things in a various overall order. (If we fully took the same route as another being through all eternal times to experience all of the eternities they experience we are talking about the same person.)

A being may have existence in multiple eternities and each full experience history which they have of any one eternity they exist in may be called a personality which belongs to their overall identity. Overlaying two personalities - in parallel can define a greater degree/richness of experience of personality... Between any two personalities (orderings) that change in time there are a number of places (possibly infinite) to connect the two sequences so that one may experience the other in parallel to its own - and together define a greater experience of personality - together it makes another possible eternity... various beings may share identical eternities or eternal personalities but no two beings share exactly the same eternities without a difference. One or other of the two beings must have a difference in the definition of its identity - at least one various unshared eternity or eternal personality. For many richly defined beings there are many other very similarly defined beings who can be associated with it. There may be beings who differ from you by only one infinitesimal element of experience in all of eternity - so that you may be considered collectively with those sharing big amounts of your exact experience as if you were like clones sharing large amounts of your substance like conjoined twins.

Time is a transient experience of all the experiences of all change in eternity that merely experience all of time, unpopulated by the other experiences in time, going forwards or backwards infinitesimal step by infinitesimal step - so that nothing but mathematically related experiences of empty change are experienced. Yet the fully populated eternity is the collective experience of the all - They experience time, full of all experiences, in the maximum number of ways in the greatest collection of orderings. If a being is in time, time is in the being. God may experience all of time for a while with all of its senses of change - forwards and backwards - all this even within an infinitesimal instant of time and with total population of beings and ideal experience. From time to time, some things, for certain beings, may not be experienced in the present but only before or after the time of the event.

Things go in and out of existence as sequenced by time - which is a dynamic filter of the greatest instantaneous experience, so that time creates the experience of all beings by multiple dynamic subtractions from it. Time may appear full of all the current events in the universe or time may for a long while sequence a series of lesser experiences - subsets of the universal experience.

God is stronger and ultimately greater in might and power than the all since He limits what can ever be experienced in the all. He limits what can be appreciated, considered, investigated, evaluated, negotiated, known, perceived, observed or imagined so that overall in eternity experience is good, happy, true and free - temporary sin and suffering becomes forever changed and forgotten. God has no current experience of darkness in His Own personal Being - to Him all is visible - yet others that exist within Him have a personal capacity to contain darkness - empty limitation of sight. God does experience the darkness that others have in them. The all - the experiencers of all of the experiences in existence are greater numerically than God in terms of multiplicity of personal experience in time of all event histories... The entire creation does not always have greater richness of experience than the Creator Who gives the experiences to each creature during the time periods of their existence.

A being may experience a lesser beings' ignorance as well as experiencing its other experiences.

The universe is the collection of all currently existing experiencers and experience. The entire creation is the collection of all currently existing beings who are either firstly non-existent from infinite past history, receiving their created existence with a finite past history, or the remainder, whose existence has an infinite past history, both categories of which include creatures who are temporarily annihilated and re-created.

Another universe is defined relative to a subset of experience histories of a collection of beings, as a set of beings whose subset of experience histories are not affected by the desires or choices of the first subset of experience histories... influence of desire or choice joins universes...

Beings choose to experience the ownership of attentions to experiences, or decisions about experiences, or efforts to influence experiences that God refuses to ever experience in Himself, which are the inclinations to do sin or error, or to prefer darkness (empty limitation of sight) within oneself which is, during the times of sin, a preference that we should seek to escape. God's ideal for us, currently, is that we should receive insight into the full observation of the eternal universe that God is maintaining in Himself during this time of sin and suffering. This sight is to harmonize with His temporary work of judging His creation. So God is drawing all His creatures out of the preference for darkness, which He has made a sinful ruler in the universe, and into the goodness of His mysterious light. If any of us persist in owning sinful or false attentions, decisions or intentions we will have to experience punishments from God that reduce our freedom until we are purged of them, unless we happen to be graced with immediate and total forgiveness of any specific sins - then we will not be judged for them - provided we are fully forgiving of sins against us.

When all beings come to experience connectedness to God's experience of them God begins to become God to all. God becomes the all in all whenever, as His will prevails, He becomes God to all when the universe is aware of its connectedness throughout to God and the entire universe of experience becomes transcendent enough that all beings experience God's entire experience of the ideal eternal universe. Also for God to be the all in each one, error and evil must be removed, so, across all eternity, God cannot be the all in all, but after sin and evil has been entirely removed He can be.

Mathematically speaking, God can be counted by the ever extending number line - the natural numbers. Also true is that many other infinite beings exist that can be counted by the natural number line - for instance any one that, unlike God, doesn't exist with infinite past history, but when they first come to exist in time have a finite past history yet continue to exist for infinite time future...

Mathematics and Physics:   Can you put infinity in a test tube? Can you test its existence? Try this experiment - examine brain activity of someone counting... not quite a test tube but it links science to maths. Remember all that is needed to prove infinity is the counting action and the imagination of repeatability which is an experience based on time passage and memory - all scientific.
   Infinity has no boundaries, and yet it is scientific. God has no boundaries too, so what can make Him unscientific?
   Any manifestation conceptual or closer to elemental experiences of sense data is scientific - based on experience. A hallucination or vision are as genuine an experience in the brain as any sight experience through the eyes - simply because they are brain-based rather than eye-fed does not make them less scientific - remember science simply means knowledge - and as such is an aggregation of time-based experience in our minds just as the experience of abstracting numbers from experience of separation in space of various colours - conceptual experience is as real and elemental to reality's full experience as is simpler direct experiences such as colour representation in the brain of retinal cells' activity.
   Subjective concept or sense experience and the objective objects of experience can be a seemlessly linked whole.
   The experience of quantity in the mind is scientific as it is mathematical and a mathematical experience is as manifest as a scientific one.

Infinite ordering of all things - the oneness of infinity - infinity is one size:   The natural numbers 1,2,3,4,5.. extended infinitely contain an infinite number of infinite sequences and so are able to count or sequence the real numbers and infact all things by means of an infinite 'bootstrapped' correspondence... (For those unfamiliar with the evolution of biological life the development of embrios or computers, a bootstrapped process is where a set of very simple individual initial correspondences or commands are, once set up, followed by the next logical level of slightly more extended correspondences or commands and so forth until a potentially infinitely complex system can be developed from a minimised amount of program code.)
   An initial step of a simple method of making such a correpondence might be to initially touch, by correspondence to an infinite series of multiples of a prime number (- perhaps twos with the infinite series 2,4,6,8,...), the initial element only of some infinite thing - such as (using base 10) the number 0.1 in every possible dimension of space, then to proceed to another infinite thing and count next using another set of prime multiples - perhaps threes - but excuding all multiples of the base of the initial counting series (which I chose as 2). So that would go; 3,(exclude 6)9,(exclude 12)15,21,27,33,... .
   Also each list of prime number based multiples (with exclusion of all repeats from previous multiple lists) can be itself broken into an infinite number of separate infinite sequences according to the same original pattern of taking first the multiples of 2, then of 3, then of 5, and so on through the prime numbers and excluding repeats from earlier sequences in the later sequences. So for instance the sequence of multiples of 2 can be further broken into infinitely many sequences as follows; 4,8,12,16,20,... , 6,18,30,42,... and so on, and likewise for multiples of 3 and 5 and 7 and the other prime multiple sequences. So this second layer of complexity in the algorithm creates another degree of subdivision of the natural numbers into an infinite sequence of infinite sequences of infinite sequences. Now this adding of a layer of complexity by breaking up subsequences into further subsequences is a process that can be repeated infinitely so that the natural numbers can in principle never run out of infinite sequences with which to count infinite sets of things in the eternal universe, thus the natural numbers can in principle count, by one to one correspondence, everything in eternity including themselves. So every set or element of a set in eternity can be given a unique identifying natural number - and of course the whole one-to-one correspondence or matching can be re-ordered ad infinitum to assign everything a various natural number - and each matching can be assigned one of the natural numbers within each matching - so that the matchings are also self-referencing.
   So, as there are an infinite number of infinite subsequences in the natural number sequence one can proceed systematically through the infinite number of infinite things in the universe - by process of infinite layering of some systematic sequential process that 'bootstraps' every infinite list of things onto the initial numbers that spawn infinite sequences within the natural numbers.
   As follows I will count one dimension of the real numbers using the sequences that exist within the sequence 2,4,6,8,10,... which are as follows: 4,8,12,16,20,... , then 6,18,30,42,... , and then 10,50,70,110,... etc... where the sequences have all common numbers removed from the later sequences. So then, the first sequence can count through all the real numbers that exist between 0 and 1 inclusive by a process of halving and then halving the halves etc - in other words, first, listing all those rational numbers in base 2 between 0 and 1 inclusive and then simply defining all numbers between 0 and 1 by adding base 2 fractions to each other in a systematic infinite sequence - which defines real numbers by systematically finding all the infinitely many finite sums of base 2 fractions and the infinitely many infinite sums of base 2 fractions in one infinite sequence. So what results might be this systematic pattern: 0,   0.1,   0.01, 0.11,   0.001, 0.011, 0.101, 0.111,   0.0001, 0.0011, 0.0101, 0.0111, 0.1001, 0.1011, 0.1101, 0.1111, ...
   You can work systematically through all the numbers that have a particular number of places in base 2 and then go on to those numbers with one more total number of places in base 2 etc... So then, the first sequence can count through all the real numbers that exist between 1 and -1 inclusive by a similar process that process of halving and then halving the halves etc except for each number other than 0 a negative number of the same size can be counted in along with the positive number. And then by similar halving process, the second sequence in the multiples of 2 can count through the numbers between 2 and 1 inclusive of 2 but not 1, and between -2 and -1 inclusive of -2 but not -1, and so on for the third sequence and the rest of the sequences towards the infinite limit - taking in all the real numbers in one dimension.
   There are an infinite number of sequences in which to use these prime number based counting series and an infinite number of orders in which to sequence the various infinite things of the infinite creation... The infinite range of time, proceeding from a beginning of a creation at a (finite) point in history, affords scope for creatures bound into this limited experience with no infinite past, to discover, as time progresses for them into the infinite future, absolutely everything that can be discovered, including the past that they did not at first experience...

Uniqueness or difference transcends similarity, symmetry and repetition. Difference - complexity of pattern and asymmetry contain more information (complexity) per unit volume than similarity and symmetry. Difference is the primary concept in determining the richness of an experience rather than similarity and difference is conceptually independent of similarity. Whereas similarity is conceptually dependent on uniqueness and difference. Difference is various to similarity yet difference is not similar to similarity. Primarily, difference defines how difference and similarity relate - not similarity which is secondary. Order is an asymmetric consideration of separation - involving more difference than mere separation.

There are infinitely many separate (various) experiences. Order specifies more difference than separation - there are always at least two orders for every separation - all the experiences of existence may be ordered... So beings-experiencers, through their experiences of order, they are distinguishable by the orders of their experience.

Order is more general than time - time is defined by order - there are at least four sub-orders in eternity - time, preference, cause and spatial order. Order sequences everything in eternity: - the reverse ordering of time and the experiences of separation WITHOUT order; - cause as equivalent to effect - or time as mere directionless change - or time with a lack of perception of change - time as space. Time is the way in which the multiplicity of orders of experience within time are all ordered together. Eternity holds two time directions for this co-orderedness. Each time direction may be experienced separately or together - from eternal past to eternal future and simultaneously from eternal future to eternal past. The totality of experience is ordered by eternal time - things can be experienced, not experienced and then re-experienced in sequence - this is what existence in time facilitates. Eternal time orders all things including the experience of itself - various passages through time in either direction either experienced simultaneously or separately... All imaginations of causual relationships are also ordered within time. Time orders the order in which beings take turns at existing so as to have experience.

Beings may for a time only experience time backwards... or while experiencing it forwards they can also experience it moving backwards to meet at some point in the 'middle'. This middle point may vary.

Some beings want to change and interact in chosen ways within their ranges of permissible activity whilst others may simply choose how to act without desiring what they choose. Also, others meanwhile may have desires yet cannot choose for or against anything. There are degrees of force with which choices may be implemented also. Beings may find themselves forcing things to come about with no sense of desire or choice.

Fundamental experiences are order, effort, desire, causality, will/choice, force, sequence, change, separation, future foresight, present perception, observation, imagination, past history-memory and identity... Order orders how beings come to have experience of order rather than mere separation. [Disorder is an order that is not desired, or the lack of experience of order - only separation] Beings may experience effort in order to desire, choose or force a choice. Beings with desire either desire change or unchange of experience, and may desire some instant experiences, choices and changes of experience more than others. Beings with experience of causality can imagine causual influences - causual experience may be cause of existence or change or direction of change. If the impulse for a change (will) is met with the experience of the desired change it may be imagined that it caused the event, if not it may still be imagined to cause what was not desired. Beings with will/choice experience selection of some aspect of the future based on imagination of choice of consequential experience caused by time and/or rules of consequence of present actions for time spans of future experience. These rules of consequence together with the choices of the individuals with times' flow itself are causually linked to the future. Beings with choice experience preferences that may be imagined to have more force if they are imagined to cause more. All beings have a unique identity - and a basic identifying experience-type that they hold as their signifier throughout eternity - at all points of time in which they have existence in all eternal times and eternities in which they have existence or identity.

Infinite variety: A single swap can re-order an infinite ordering... so why should infinite length extending through eternal time not be fit into a finite length of eternal time as well... - The infinite line of the Real numbers maps onto any finite line within itself... So for many beings infinite lengths of their experience within eternity are contained within these finite life spans infinitely many times in infinitely varied ways - so that they repeat the whole at various intervals within the whole. Thus the whole of an eternity is may be defined by containing holes in which the rest of the eternity fits into in a repeating way so that the hole also contains another smaller hole into which again fits the eternity, so far defined, ad infinitum until all the infinitely many holes within the holes are filled with the outer definition repeated over and over towards the limit when the hole is infinitesimal. Otherwise, for periods of time, eternal histories may not contain such places of awareness of the whole of that history, or of the whole of the history of the eternal universe.

For long periods many beings can experience the full breadth of many other beings' experience in the universe, while other times, their experience is reduced to a much narrower track of experiences... To begin with, some of the greatest beings experience many other beings' continuous experience continuously throughout the beginning of their their existence in time so that the other's track of experience is a subset of their's... yet the greatest beings can also, from the beginning, experience infinite spans of history - future or past - in other beings' experience over some time interval, within a finite span of their own history.

Everything in eternity fits into an infinitely ordered Eternal-Whole which can be mapped onto the natural numbers to an infinite degree in an infinitely involved way... How? Any infinite ordering (possibly time line) can be re-ordered infinitely. All the orderings can then be assigned to any particular infinite set of finite lines of the eternal time line which may lie within a particular span of eternity. The ordering of the orderings in the time line can then be re-ordered either for inclusion in another part of the same being's time line or for another being's time line... In this sort of way eternity or the eternal universe can get packed infinitely dense with experience.
    The collective all's ordering of experience is greater than others in that it can be perceived to have the most variety of relationships towards all beings' individual orderings of experience - in other words, the summation all can be interrelated to all beings' individual orders of experience (for instance according to causality or codification) in the the way that has the greatest variety...

Cause is a glue that orders mutuality in existence - an infinite collection of ways to connect things with an arbitary abstract order - anything can be supposed to cause anything else - in all there is one big cause network - the limit of re-ordering the re-orderings of orders of experiencing experiences of various numbers of beings' experience over various periods of their eternal life spans -- some beings can experience more abstracted causual concepts (imaginations of order relationships) than others yet all beings are equally causual - part of the causual network - no causes can be considered more causual than others - either something is part of a cause or it is not - every part of a collective set of causes of any one event are equally necessary in the cause definition - every being can be imagined to cause everything else yet some beings can be imagined to cause things in a greater number of ways than others...

It is possible in a particular line segment of some beings' history to squeeze ever more infinite lines of history until an infinite density of experience of change of information is reached relative to other parallel lines history of other beings less able to find that richness of experience in the same period of historical time (objective time). Relative to some other being who experiences only two things for that stretch of historical time that happen to be in common with the experience of this first being - the first instant experience and the last instant experience - the first being can be said to change infinitely fast relative to it although the single change seems to take longer from the point of view of the being experiencing an infinite amount of change of experience information over the finite period. This being, without the gaps in the shared experience, has the most objective perception of length of historical time while the being that only experiences the first and last two events may have a subjectively limited perception of historical time. Thus duration of historical time perception over a finite period is absolutely relative to the being that experiences the most instants of sequential events of history over the finite period of historical time. So historical time's essential clocks are infinitely information-dense alternators - ...This is why the greater you become in historical time the more 'inner' you are in historical time - experiencing more of the richness of objective historical time... The experience of subjective (real) time between two contiguous instants of objective historical time can seem short or long - making the way we experience an objectively measured rate of change seem subjectively quick and/or slow.

Imaginations may be experienced in an instant or imagination may take time to operate and so allow people to imagine ordering or asymetric abstract ways of considering the instantaneous experience of a spatial dimension (such as causality) over a greater than instant period of time. Instantaneous imagination or experience is possible of if-then-scenarios ('if-then' is an ordering or collection of imaginations of present connecting to future forming a hypothetical (true for your present moment) plan of action or collective view of possibility), change (and so strength, might, power) and causality.

Influence relationships may be imagined between events that are relatively present, future or past in any order. People can imagine changing the past because time can be experienced backwards, however time is a causality that connects contiguous infinitesimal instant experiences in infinite sequence with an asymmetry experience that is reversible while the sequence history itself is defining of all existence - it cannot be undone. A person can only 'go back in time' by re-experiencing the past they cannot subtract from it only add to it. Existence - fully populated eternity cannot be re-defined just as red is not blue. Imagination - the creation of experiences with ambiguous or hypothetical identities and positions - exists in the present, therefore imagination of various pasts is possible without actually entering the past and adding anything to it.

Time never stops... The beings who have an infinite past existence spend their infinite beginnings, which take a finite period of time, fully at one with God's will - blamelessly doing His ideal will. During this infinite beginning God limits their experience to be less than His Own and thus gives them an individually limited defining personality - then there is a finite period where created beings are allowed to sin to a small degree and be corrupted after which all beings become blameless again and are perfected into a full experience of all that God experiences - when God becomes the all in all (or the all in each one). After God is all in all for a time then infinite eternal histories - with infinite histories of experience from past to infinite future are re-experienced by alternative beings in various orders and at various rates until God again becomes all in all and a similar process repeats in endless progression...

All but one of the hypothetical outcomes of a choice remain hypothetical. Nothing merely hypothetical can happen except in the instantaneous imagination. All choices can be imagined to be caused by any being from any time. To believe in God as Truth means to decide what you desire to choose based on the assumption that your knowledge of Him is a reliable guide to outcomes of choice - that hypothetical outcomes of hypothetical choices are either to be desired to be chosen or not - regardless of what you infact choose. All choice is then an endless instant-by-instant test of God's truthfulness or your choice based on some other factor than faith in God's truthfulness. Faith chooses, so does doubt. Faith has eyes - doubt does not, - the question is - does using these eyes or refusing them get you the outcome you desire. Whichever choice you make God can be imagined to be causing that choice. Faith says I see how to get what I choose - doubt says I don't need to see what I choose and I have no plan of how to choose other than waiting to find out what I end up choosing - personal caprice. Faith makes use of a conscience and perhaps also a god while doubt goes it alone. God eventually makes all other beings choose faith in His strength to prevail and eventually reward Himself with what He most desires to make all others desire and get this reward for themselves also, by faith in Him.

Rulership is attaining a greater influence from your attentions, decisions and efforts than another in such a way that your influence also limits the influences of others. Rulership or potency expressed is called force - forces are qualities that have strength to initiate change, might to maintain change against opposing forces and/or power to change quickly (with greater density of experience-change in any particular period of objective historical time).

Many beings may spend time experiencing other's, while others cannot experience them... To participate willingly with the desire to change the experience of other beings, one needs to know that choosing a particular personal experience will give another being a particular kind of experience that they want or do not. To know whether they do or not one needs to come to experience something from the other being's set of desires. This means knowing that parts of our experience relate to the experience of other beings in particular ways (perhaps according to simple rules)...

An experience that you may give someone else may perhaps be a various experience or the same one that you willed towards them. You may perhaps feel that you are trying to wave to them so that it appears quick and slow yet for them it appears perhaps only quick. (Time's passing can be experienced with various sensations of absolute subjective flow velocity whatever the objective flow velocity measured relative to an experience over the time interval that contains the maximum density of experience for that time interval).


back to homepage